Accomack County
A Comprehensive Study of Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models
Zhang, Ningyu, Yao, Yunzhi, Tian, Bozhong, Wang, Peng, Deng, Shumin, Wang, Mengru, Xi, Zekun, Mao, Shengyu, Zhang, Jintian, Ni, Yuansheng, Cheng, Siyuan, Xu, Ziwen, Xu, Xin, Gu, Jia-Chen, Jiang, Yong, Xie, Pengjun, Huang, Fei, Liang, Lei, Zhang, Zhiqiang, Zhu, Xiaowei, Zhou, Jun, Chen, Huajun
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown extraordinary capabilities in understanding and generating text that closely mirrors human communication. However, a primary limitation lies in the significant computational demands during training, arising from their extensive parameterization. This challenge is further intensified by the dynamic nature of the world, necessitating frequent updates to LLMs to correct outdated information or integrate new knowledge, thereby ensuring their continued relevance. Note that many applications demand continual model adjustments post-training to address deficiencies or undesirable behaviors. There is an increasing interest in efficient, lightweight methods for on-the-fly model modifications. To this end, recent years have seen a burgeoning in the techniques of knowledge editing for LLMs, which aim to efficiently modify LLMs' behaviors within specific domains while preserving overall performance across various inputs. In this paper, we first define the knowledge editing problem and then provide a comprehensive review of cutting-edge approaches. Drawing inspiration from educational and cognitive research theories, we propose a unified categorization criterion that classifies knowledge editing methods into three groups: resorting to external knowledge, merging knowledge into the model, and editing intrinsic knowledge. Furthermore, we introduce a new benchmark, KnowEdit, for a comprehensive empirical evaluation of representative knowledge editing approaches. Additionally, we provide an in-depth analysis of knowledge location, which can give a deeper understanding of the knowledge structures inherent within LLMs. Finally, we discuss several potential applications of knowledge editing, outlining its broad and impactful implications.
- North America > United States > Minnesota > Hennepin County > Minneapolis (0.28)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District > Vancouver (0.14)
- North America > United States > California > Los Angeles County > Los Angeles (0.14)
- (21 more...)
- Research Report > New Finding (1.00)
- Overview (1.00)
- Research Report > Promising Solution (0.66)
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (1.00)
- Health & Medicine (0.92)
- Leisure & Entertainment (0.92)
- (4 more...)
Inspecting and Editing Knowledge Representations in Language Models
Hernandez, Evan, Li, Belinda Z., Andreas, Jacob
Neural language models (LMs) represent facts about the world described by text. Sometimes these facts derive from training data (in most LMs, a representation of the word "banana" encodes the fact that bananas are fruits). Sometimes facts derive from input text itself (a representation of the sentence "I poured out the bottle" encodes the fact that the bottle became empty). We describe REMEDI, a method for learning to map statements in natural language to fact encodings in an LM's internal representation system. REMEDI encodings can be used as knowledge editors: when added to LM hidden representations, they modify downstream generation to be consistent with new facts. REMEDI encodings may also be used as probes: when compared to LM representations, they reveal which properties LMs already attribute to mentioned entities, in some cases making it possible to predict when LMs will generate outputs that conflict with background knowledge or input text. REMEDI thus links work on probing, prompting, and LM editing, and offers steps toward general tools for fine-grained inspection and control of knowledge in LMs.
- North America > United States > Minnesota > Hennepin County > Minneapolis (0.14)
- Europe > Germany > Bavaria > Upper Bavaria > Munich (0.04)
- Asia > Japan (0.04)
- (23 more...)
- Law (1.00)
- Leisure & Entertainment > Sports (0.68)
- Education > Educational Setting > Higher Education (0.67)
- (2 more...)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Cognitive Science > Problem Solving (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Large Language Model (0.94)